Watch as our Lead Negotiator, Kay Emmert, walks through the highlights of the 2nd Contract, which we signed in 2019 here referred to as a Tentative Agreement, as this video was made before ratification) and what happened in the room to get us here.

Before the 2016 strike won NTFC our first contract, most non-tenure track faculty (NTT’s) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) had little to no job security. While some individuals were appointed on contracts lasting several years, most of our members were appointed on one-year contracts.

Each spring, these NTT’s faced the stressful possibility of having to go back on the job market for the fall. Updating resumes, securing letters of recommendation, and searching national job listings were regular parts of our members’ jobs, parts that competed with their duties to their students, their departments, and their research. Uncertain of their future, many were hesitant to buy homes in Champaign-Urbana or invest in the community they might be forced to leave the following year. This was not only a problem for new hires. Even NTT’s that had been at the university for a long time, sometimes decades, had no assurance that they would have their job come fall.

In addition to this regular stress and uncertainty, there was no guarantee of when NTT’s would be notified of reappointment. Some NTT’s would receive notice as late as July or August–just weeks before the semester began–that they had not been reappointed for that academic year. For these NTT’s, it was often times far too close to the start of the fall semester at other colleges and universities to find comparable work. This meant that many would be jobless or be forced to do jobs outside their fields with fewer benefits, resulting in great hardships for them and their families.

This precarity had other consequences as well. Uncertain of their futures, NTT’s were hesitant to do anything that might challenge the practices of people in power. As a result, academic freedom suffered. This fear was reinforced in 2014 after Dr. Steven Salaita had his offer to join the faculty rescinded when the Chancellor’s office reviewed pro-Palestinian tweets on his personal Twitter account. If something like this could happen to a tenure-track faculty member, NTT’s felt their own abilities to voice dissent were nearly nonexistent.

Our Union Fights for Job Security

For the first contract, these issues of job security were a top priority. NTFC won guarantees that letters of non-reappointment concerning the following fall would be sent out by May of each year. And although efforts to provide multi-year appointments failed, we did win a stipulation for those who have been in the bargaining unit for six years, granting them one extra year of an equivalent appointment, should they be let go.

For the second contract, we pushed and won even more. Under the new contract, those who are Teaching Associate Professors, Teaching Professors, Clinical Associate Professors, or Clinical Professors for three consecutive academic years will receive contracts lasting at least two years.

With our first and second contracts, we have come a long way from the precarity of one-year contracts and late appointment decision notices that used to be regular parts of NTT life at UIUC. We do, however, still have a long way to go. Some of us, especially newer hires, still face serious job security concerns in their first few years with the university.

We will continue to fight for your interests, but we need your ideas, your energy, and your expertise to make NTT job security at UIUC a reality.

Please reach out anytime. NTFC works best when we all work together!

Minimum Raises

Apart from getting assured minimum salaries and compression wage raises for NTT’s, NTFC has fought to ensure that each NTT will get a raise from our contracts. Before we successfully negotiated our second contract this summer, there was no assurance that our members would be making more this year as an NTT than they did last year. With today’s rapidly increasing costs of living, especially in healthcare, many NTT’s found that they needed their salaries to increase every year to keep up. While the Chancellor and Provost did announce salary increase programs from time to time, these were entirely at their discretion. We as NTT’s had no say in when we might see our next raise.

So, as a union, we negotiated language in our contract that secures minimum salary increases. Our contract states that your salary should be increasing by at least 1% each year for the first three academic years of our contract (AY 2019-2022). From AY 2023-2024, your salary should increase by at least 1.25%. If you do not receive at least this much of a raise, you are entitled to documentation from your department explaining their decision.

In negotiations this past summer, we also knew that our members were expected to see a jump in healthcare costs outside of normal inflation. Because of this, we negotiated to include a one-time, $750 bonus for all faculty employed at the university as of August 15th, 2019 (just before the 2019 AY began on August 16th, 2019). So, if you thought your September paycheck seemed much larger than normal, this is likely the reason.

Your Union, Your Issues

We’ve been able to address a lot of the issues relating to wages that our members face in the past few years. We’ve added contract language to establish guaranteed salary minimums, salary compression adjustments, guaranteed yearly raises, and more! This has been a part of the reason why our average salaries have gone up so much–together, we’ve made it happen! While we have done great things, we still have a lot of work to do to build on what we’ve already achieved in our first two contracts. If you want to see your union fight for certain issues in the next round of contract negotiations, please let us know your thoughts! We also need to remain vigilant, making sure that the gains we have fought so hard for are being followed through with. That’s why it’s so important that you know your contract!

Salary Compression

Some of our members have been teaching, researching, instructing, and working in other capacities as NTT’s for a very long time. Yet, they’re making only a little bit more now than when they first started in their positions, five, ten, or even twenty years ago. Inflation makes this problem more complicated. It means that, sometimes, new hires come in starting at pay grades that it took older hires years to achieve. This has the effect of compressing their pay relative to their experience, and it makes these faculty members feel less valued and respected by the administration even though they have given so much of their lives to this university.

We were excited to have the opportunity to negotiate over issues of salary compression in our second contract. In establishing minimum salaries in the first contract, we were conscious of the fact we’d need to build on it to ensure that it didn’t contribute to issues of salary compression. So, we negotiated language that provides for monetary recognition of long-term service to the university. Now, those who have been employed by the university since the beginning of the 2014 AY and make between $45,000 and $64,999 annually receive compression raises equivalent to $125 for each year they have been at the university in a position covered by our agreement. For example, someone who makes $48,000 a year and has been here for 7 years should have received a 7 x $125 salary raise this year ($875). So, if you’ve been here more than five years and make between the amounts above, you should check your paycheck this fall! Make sure that you’re getting the raises you deserve for your long-term service.

In part 3 of our series All About Wages, we’ll be looking more at the new, minimum salary increases that each NTT should receive yearly. Missed part 1? Read it here.